![]() |
![]() |
Problem Posts | ![]() |
![]() |
QUESTION
(Original) Three identical cylindrical barrels with radius \sqrt{3} are placed tangent to each other (represented by circles c_{1} , c_{2} , c_{3} .) A metal sheet AB is placed just touching c_{1} and c_{3}. A coin c with radius 2-\sqrt{3} is placed on the floor tangent to c_{2} and c_{3} (see the diagram), and rolled without slipping about the barrels (so that the coin is rotating clockwise), going through plank AB, until it returns to its starting point. How many radians has the coin rotated? (For example, half a turn is \pi .)
(Original) Three identical cylindrical barrels with radius \sqrt{3} are placed tangent to each other (represented by circles c_{1} , c_{2} , c_{3} .) A metal sheet AB is placed just touching c_{1} and c_{3}. A coin c with radius 2-\sqrt{3} is placed on the floor tangent to c_{2} and c_{3} (see the diagram), and rolled without slipping about the barrels (so that the coin is rotating clockwise), going through plank AB, until it returns to its starting point. How many radians has the coin rotated? (For example, half a turn is \pi .)
Separate the coin's rotation into two 'components'.
Discussion
This piece will demonstrate a particularly rare method applicable to a limited class of problems. We begin with
Subproblem 1-3.1. (Coin Rotation Paradox)
The problem begins with two identical coins, one is rotated around the other without slipping; so that it ends up on the opposite side of the other coin from where it began. It has made a single rotation yet has rolled a distance equal to half of its circumference. (Wikipedia)What's happening here? It so turns out that you have to consider two "components" of rotation:
- The first is the one caused by rotation due to path (the circumference of the stationary coin), which is \pi.
- The other one is rotation about itself. Imagine if the coin were totally slippery. This contributes another \pi radians of rotation and resolves the paradox.
Solution [show]
No comments:
Post a Comment